5 stars again for outdoing the other creationists here with angry remarks and ignoring what this thread is actually about.
And you get 5 stars for taking your peers side and blinded by the fact that I did not start this.
So was RADZ saying things about flat earth have to do anything with any thread? Does Radz saying that Elvis lives and creationists believe stuff like that have anything to do with any subject of any thread here?
You get another 5 stars for being blinded by your dislike for all creationists.
I have never once called a creationist a liar on any forum, yet it seems to be standard practice for creationists to do this to evolutionists here.
There is not much difference in implying it and saying it. One just means you are bold, the other means you are polite. But they both point to the same conclusion.
Plus I don't say it myself unless someone strongly implies it, or comes out and calls me one. Which was done on the coal post. You won't give benefit of the doubt to what you "choose" not to believe. But you will when it comes to what you "want" to believe.
As I said, if you're going to call anyone a liar, you ought to be prepared to back up the accusation with some evidence. "You're all the same" doesn't count I'm afraid.
I categorized you with your peers as you did with me in another thread where you said that I remove post from forums I moderate because I don't agree like all other creationist do.
How did it feel?
I believe that everyone should be allowed to state their positions within the rules of debate. Personally I believe this should include fair-minded moderation which gives warnings to people for insults and endless posts lacking substance or evidence for anything, but the only rules here appear to be against trolling. I certainly do not support censorship of anyone.
So I guess from now on I should match snide remarks with snide remarks. Personal attacks with perosnal attacks. And categorizations with categorization. Because no one should be censored, right?
If a person cannot act like an adult, then they should be treated like a child. Not my problem that some here choose to be childish and play one up games in every subject they cannot totally debunk.
So you deny that you have ever deleted anyone's posts? Your moniker is an uncommon one but I guess it's possible that there's another creationist Ikester posting on forums.
So I see you did research on me. At least I don't change my name from forum to forum like evolutionist do to hide that actions and tactics.
Yes I do delete posts. I never said that I don't.
I'm not here to "win" anything. I do find it strange, though, that our two most recent creationist contributors here are so full of anger and venom. This is what I'm seeing, and not statements of your position backed up with evidence which is what would move this discussion on.
Amd a evolutionist poster did not bring this on. My, you are blind.
I'm sorry if you feel a need to make these assumptions about me.
Shall I post all the places where you made assumptions about me? And categorized me as well? Pot and kettle.
But I'm also not the one who is refusing to engage with evidence presented and saying that I will instead completely ignore posts from any one person. If you want to do that it is of course your choice, but then I wonder what you will be posting in this forum if not evidence for creationism. Lots of insulting remarks about evolutionists maybe?
So here again you believe that Radz acting childish for evolution is okay? I can match that and treat all your posts like RADZ treat mine and everyone elses. Do you think you would like that? You sound like you would since you approve of it from one side.
You're taking RAZD's comments very personally. Maybe you should consider having some time to cool off so that we can all have a rational discussion here. Tirades like this aren't pleasant for anyone. I don't know what got you so worked up before you came here but it doesn't look to me like talking here is going to help you with this.
Reverse of guilt is not going to work here. I'm not the one who started it.
