Wow, that's quite a post.

The problem that I see here is the basic assumption that all scientists are liars who have a conspiratorial agenda. You believe this so fervently that you have already written more about this assumption than, I hazard to guess, the combined total of other creationists here, and that's saying something.

You've probably heard this before but I'll say it again. I'm about as religious about evolution as I am about gravity. I accept it because there is so much empirical evidence for it. I've seen lots and lots of creationist claims by now and I haven't come across a single one that didn't have some kind of flaw in its science or some misunderstanding of how we know things work. This is why I accept evolution and not creationism.

However, if you would like to provide evidence for your own position here, maybe you can be that one person I've encountered whose claims have no misunderstandings or scientific flaws. How about it?