So CTD, you are defending Ikester's decision to simply ignore what RAZD says, yes? I've learned quite a few things from reading RAZD's posts and not just on this forum. If you think he is instead just lying, it's up to you to show how the information he is presenting is erroneous. There's a big list of issues in this thread to which you have not responded, while you seem to want to play games with meanders. Meanders are not created by catastrophic floods, they are destroyed by them. I fail to see the ambiguity here.

What's more, in attempting to find some information about an obscure picture that was posted in another thread, I came across a few people who knew Ikester and one of them said that his posts had been deleted by him. Presumably you are simply assuming that this was deserved. Presumably you also feel that every post on this forum from an evolutionist also deserves to be wiped. All credit to Russ for allowing all opinions to be posted here. I thought at one point that he'd wiped one of my own posts but he hadn't, and I wouldn't expect him to do so now.

Why don't we get back to you explaining why the Grand Canyon was carved by the flood. Seems we're getting distracted again from the subject. Why don't you start by explaining how cosmogenic and uranium dating are erroneous, or how it's possible that there was a flood at all when there is no global flood layer in the geological record.