Well I'm giving you 5 stars for out-winding CTD in the "evolutionists are liars" ad hominem sweepstakes. Why an "evolutionist" allegedly wanted to delete this pic is beyond me. If you read my first post, I said that natural coal layers have been studied just like other sedimentary layers have been, and the processes for their formation are understood.

I also said that this is the problem for your argument here, and not the fact that coal can be formed rapidly in artificial conditions. The only source for your picture that I can find is the web page that you linked to, and the only information is that this is a "coal-like deposit." That doesn't give me much to go on. It's obviously different from something you would dig up in a coal seam.

If you were aiming for a peer-reviewed scientific paper publishing something about how the earth isn't old because doorknobs have been found in a "coal-like deposit," you'd be asked for more evidence. That's what I'm going to ask you for. For example, the insinuation is that the doorknobs were there while the coal formed. Has it been verified that this is the case? The caption for the picture says, "Long immersion in the sea causes it to become concreted into big masses which often contain other artifacts." -- and indeed, it looks to me like the doorknobs have been concreted to the surface -- the coal hasn't been split open to reveal doorknobs in the interior. Also, has the coal been studied under a microscope? What fossils have been found in it to date it? Can you answer? Or, I repeat, is this single picture (or other unprovenanced pictures) your sole evidence for this thread?