I have been often told that if you want to debate someone who believes in evolution. All you have to do is put up a forum or website that promotes creation and they will come. When I put up my first website and forum I found this to be very true. Because once one evolution believing person finds it, he makes sure that his peers know that it exists. And they all come and look.

Which by the way actually helps the visits of any creation site. It's like free advertisement. Which actually give the creation site or forum a kick start. Which means that the evolutionist dislike for creationists actually helps the creationist out in getting started. So the attempt to cause havok or shut down actually plays a role in getting the forum or site noticed by other people. And puts their site more firmly into any search engine. Like when you type in yec into the Google search engine ( http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4ADBF_enUS270US270&q=yec ). My site is the first on the list. I did not pay to get there. It's because of the fans who hate my site so that promote my site to the number one spot.

But I often wonder, why is it that they feel the need to search out a creation site?

My opinion is this: The challenges of creation to evolution cannot go unchallenged because evolution is not as established as a scientific theory as evolutionists would have us believe. In fact, because it cannot maintain this position without constant defense, those who do believe that it does have to not let any creation claim stand unchallenged because that would make people think alternatively from evolution to ponder other things.

If evolution was so embeded in being a scientific theory (mountains of claimed evidence), the creation challenges would just bounce off and no one would even have to defend it. And if they did, "only" science would be needed to defend it.

But when it comes to evolutionists responding to a creationist. Science is not the only thing you will see. So what this shows is a weak theory exalted to a position it cannot maintain, which requires it's believers to resort to unscientific means to defend it. These tactics are not in anyway connected to science. But are used as if they are.

And even though evolution is not claimed to be a religion. I have seen evolutionists evangelize people to their way of thinking. That is what it is when you come to a Christian forum or blog with the sole purpose of taking away believers to believe what you believe.

Evangelize: To explain ones beliefs to another in the hope that they might wish to adopt them.

Is not that what you guys do when you come here and try to convince people that creation is a lie? So your sole purpose of being here is to evangelize for evolution. If not then explain why you are here, and what your goal actually is? and I bet you cannot explain it without making it sound just like you are evangelizing just like a religion does.