My ultimate point is that evolutionists (at the highest levels) are dishonest. Of course, the reason they are dishonest is because the evolutionary myth is being used as a social control.
Your ultimate point in stating that a tanned strong man will give birth to tanned strong children is that evolutionists are dishonest? In other words strong tanned parents do NOT give birth to tanned strong children? Thank you for pointing out where the dishonesty lies.
In short, people are gullible and easily controlled.
Yes, I'm beginning to see just exactly how. Thank you.
Getting back to genotypes versus phenotypes, I believe that by making a provocative statement thereby provoking a discussion about the dishonesty of the way evolution is currently changing its own definition of itself, we can finally realize that we are being lied to.
So in other words a tanned muscular parent will
not produce tanned muscular offspring? I'm not certain how this means that evolutionists are dishonest. I certainly won't point the finger at you but you can see how someone here might think you're the one being dishonest by using an argument that is innacurate (i.e., citing that suntans and physical fitness pass from parent to offspring).
What does this have to do with the original definition of evolution (the one taught for the past 100+ years)?
It was
you who make the statement, not me - I just want an explanation as to how this is possible. The two
do correlate however (sun tan inheritance and evolution) in that you seemed to be inferring that organisms adapt and change slightly but do not "evolve" in the evolutionary/scientific definition of the term. Which is why I need an explanation as to how.
You have been baited. You have bit.
As I've already openly admitted in another thread, I realize the evolutionist posters here have deceived me. Bex has proven this for me by observing LindaLou's, RAZD's and LinearAq's "complex" wording. However, if I could just figure out how a parent passes his sun tan and physical fitness on to his child, I think I could understand how I've been lead astray. This is where you and CTD come in since I am too ignorant and naieve to figure out the answer.
Or are you saying there is no answer? You were kind enough to reply to my post but you still haven't indicated one way or the other if a) this is possible and if so then b) how.
