Distracting again I see, CTD.
The point being there is no evidence for a flood layer in the Grand Canyon.
'The Point' changes every time you post, if you're talking about "the point you'd like me to waste time discussing so you can ignore it and issue more spam."
Since when was a marine environment the same as a flood-? The deposits in those sedimentary layers show that they were formed in a calm environment. I can elucidate if you want.
Might be amusing. But until you make up your mind about whether or not there's a flood layer, I don't think your posts'll be very coherent.
Or more interesting still, as you have done, you can say there's no evidence at all for a flood layer, yet perversely still claim there was a catastrophic flood.
I said there was no single worldwide layer that represented the flood. I made it clear that flood layers exist and need to be identified locally.
Tell me, how strong is the sensation of pleasure when you compose these? How long does it endure?
Why not address just one of my questions above.
Haven't I heard that before? Yes I have. Yet the spam continues.
When has it ever done any good to answer one of your questions? Show me even one occasion if you can.
