Explain how cosmogenic or uranium dating for the erosion of the Grand Canyon is wrong
OK, I'll say it again.
Lies.It is hard for me to believe that someone as obviously intelligent as you fails to see that more explanation is needed. I have asked several times that you provide at least some of the intermediate steps required to arrive at your conclusions.
I have assured you that I am not as intellectually gifted as you and need more information to understand.
What part of the dating process is being lied about?
What information shows these dates to be lies?
Your incessant faith in the decreasing (false) evidence for evolution is amazing, especially considering that you hold so many contradicting ideas in your mind at once (I know your history here).
Looks like you are evaluating LindaLou rather than the information she provided. Is this an example of an ad hominem attack? Surely not!
Catastrophic flood is the only reasonable explanation for the canyon.
What is your number one piece of evidence that convinces you of this? Keep the explanation simple so that we can follow the logic please.
You have to remember this premise when examining "evidence" Linda. Don't forsake the fundamentals, even when people ask you too. History demonstrates that 99 times out of 100, the final explanation is the one containing common sense.
What was the common sense that lead to the conclusion that angular momentum is conserved in the absence of a any exterior forces?
What common sense lead to the heliocentric solar system?
What common sense lead to the theory of relativity?
What common sense lead to the germ theory of disease?
What possible question could I ask that would get you to explain what you mean in your cryptic posts?
What's amazing to me is that lie after lie is exposed coming from evolution scientists, and yet, the devout disciples of the faith continue to trust whatever they are told.
What's amazing to me is that you believe that the behavior of some evolutionists makes the theory untrue while claiming the behavior of some Christians has no effect on the truth of Christianity.
How is this valid logic?
A detailed explanation would be needed here for me to not see this as a contradiction.
What's even more amazing is that evolutionists like to call Christians gullible.
Not all of them.
This is an information war, Linda.
Then why are your posts so lacking in information?
You will have to face this reality eventually.
And we can always remind those who don't believe as we do that God will punish them for it.
