why cosmogenic and uranium dating methods are wrong, how a catastrophic flood can cut a meander of the type we've seen in pictures here, how layer upon layer of fossils from marine environments with evidence of growing in place can be evidence of a flood, what an aeolian (wind-blown) sandstone deposit is doing in a supposed flood layer and why it contains tracks of spiders and scorpions, why a flood would cut a channel into ground which is higher than that surrounding it, what paleosols are doing in the Grand Canyon, why none of the layers display mixed or hydrological sorting of fossils or other materials which would be expected in a flood . . .
. . . is "BS" about distraction and avoiding issues? Nice one. Notice that CTD is again ignoring this list and is playing silly word games about river meanders (he has ignored, for example, the fact that I said catastrophic floods do not cut meanders). If he had clear evidence for his own position, it would not be difficult for him to directly answer the above questions. Would you like to address some of this evidence yourself while you are here, or simply continue to tell us that we are conspiratorial obfuscators?
