When deciphering, it pays to keep in mind that what you're working with may be illogical or contain no actual meaning at all. This is especially likely to be true when $500 words are present. The idea is to get you so busy looking up the word and trying to figure out which definition applies, that you overlook the fact that the rest of what is written is flawed or just nonsense.
I agree. I am aware of the intellectual smoke-screen game playing, but not confident enough or familiar enough to always unravel and expose it. Intimidation tactics can (and often do) work well, plus confusion. Particularly on those newer to these kinds of debates and less familar with the terminology.
I don't have quite the knowledge or passion in this area than perhaps you do. I can assure you it's not for want of trying.
You're too modest. There have been times when I refrained from posting because I didn't want to distract attention from the strong arguments and evidence you presented.
A compliment indeed coming from you. Thank you!
If it wasn't my content that was criticised, it was my technique from a certain member on here, so much so, it was almost comical had it not been so tiring.
That's the whole key. Don't try to argue all issues. Don't try to debunk all bunk. I confess I do set a poor example.
No, you set a good example of someone not being swayed by ongoing petty criticism (peer pressure) to force you into 'debunking all bunk'. You seem to receive it with an air of amusement at times without really getting your feathers ruffled. Someone more emotional would not handle it quite so well.
I see no reason why you should feel pressured into anything, and you've shown...you're not.
Thanks for the rest of your post too. Knowing what to expect can help, or at least having it confirmed and realising one is not alone in picking up the same!
Cheers
