Another video, Russ? May I ask why you no longer seem to be writing your own words here?

I started watching this and it began with an out-of-context quotation from Colin Patterson which he himself acknowledges as such; you can find detailed information about the true context of the quote, as well as ample evidence that Patterson is in no way saying that there are no trnasitional forms, here.

Your speaker then goes on to begin quoting Stephen J. Gould, another favourite target of creationist quote mines. Can't be asked to listen to the thousandth creationist quote mine there.

I don't understand why creationists here think that out-of-context quotes from scientists proves anything. First, appealing to quotes in this way is a logical fallacy called argument from authority. Second, it is a misrepresentation of what the person actually said -- it would be like me going through here and deliberately cherry-picking things creationists have said in order to make it look as if they are presenting a totally different position, for example -- and third, the implication here seems to be, in the case of people like Gould, that scientists are conspiratorial liars who occasionally are "tripped up" by their own words in revealing the truth.

No reasonable person is going to buy any of it. Now, are there any salient points in the vid that you'd like to summarise, Russ? Anything to do with any of the subjects under discussion in this particular thread?