I get the impression that you think I'm referring to you personally a lot of the time in comments I make. This isn't the case. It's your choice whether to talk here or not. I have spoken to a number of other creationists lately who have chosen to completely ignore the evidence contradicting their views, or at least correcting their inaccurate understanding of various scientific issues. They're not ready to deal with these things yet. If you want to include yourself in that group that's fine, but I was not thinking of you or the fact you hadn't participated here lately.
Also, if you read carefully here, you will see that CTD has not presented evidence to back up many of his views. He cannot identify a "flood layer" anywhere on earth, he cannot explain why he thinks that scientific dating methods are wrong, he cannot explain why the Grand Canyon does not exhibit the known and understood characteristics of other areas which were created by catastrophic flooding, of which pictures and links have been provided here. You might find his remarks to the evolutionists entertaining maybe, but they don't prove anything other than the fact that he's trying to avoid issues that make his own position problematic.
Maybe you all should invite more creationists to come over here who are willing to engage more directly. I think CTD must appear "heoric" to you because he so stubbornly continues to waffle on at us and says "I don't believe it" and "scientisis are liars" over and over.
How do I have time for this? I don't watch TV. I am too ill to do many of the things I used to enjoy, such as going for hikes. It's something to pass the time with, learn from, and use to keep my mind sharp. And it interests me to see how far people are willing to ignore or deny evidence in order to preserve beliefs. Some good case studies here.
