Hey Bex, I'm curious

Quote
Linear, considering he has to battle 3-4 for evolutionists on here at once and put up with nit picking at the sametime, I think he's doing remarkably well.
What's to battle? All he needs to do is show evidence for a flood instead of giving the run around and make stuff up. Most of the posts are repeated requests for him to actually substantiate a position.

No evidence for a flood (not one)

No evidence that skin does not reproduce by mitosis like bacteria

No evidence that tanning is hereditary

No evidence that Darwin's theory had something more to it than descent with modification aka change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation

One can keep going back and adding to the list of items that CTD claims but somehow cannot show any evidence that his opinion is nothing but fantasy.

Now we have a claim that there were two floods, and we still don't have any evidence for the first one.

Quote
He's also pointed out that people can use the scroll bar and read for themselves and decide if they wish.
Here's a test for you: the next time he says this scroll up and see if you can find what he is talking about. You say he is holding up well on his own, and I have to wonder why NONE of the creationists are able to provide the evidence. If you really have EVIDENCE rather than more assertion, then it is easy to repeat it:

[Linked Image]

Just because CTD posts something, that doesn't mean it is an answer, that it actually DEALS with the facts.

Enjoy.