Really?! If CTD is doing so well, then his refutation of the points made by RAZD (just to name one evolutionist) should be easy for you recognize and point out. You made the judgment call that he is doing well.
Can you show us just one refutation of ONE point made by RAZD in the Grand Canyon thread where CTD acquits himself well? Can you explain how that refutation actually addresses the point made by RAZD and shows that point to be incorrect?
If you cannot explain how the "evidence" provided by CTD refutes the evidence/conclusions provided by us, then I fail to see how you are in any position to evaluate the quality of his "battling" skills.
I will concede one area to him however. While I am not innocent of typing insulting remarks, CTD leaves me completely in the dust with his versatility and consistency in that regard.
Perhaps this is the skill to which you refer when making pronouncements about CTD's ability to keep us "evolutionists" at bay.
Linear, considering he has to battle 3-4 for evolutionists on here at once and put up with nit picking at the sametime, I think he's doing remarkably well. I would not have lasted. I didn't! guess the "pair pressure" drove me out of debating. I'm not here to pinpoint each every "point" made in every post and who has addressed them thoroughly. I'm well aware both sides accuse the other of similar. My point is, he's holding up when it would be too easy "give up" under the fire. If you feel he's not addressing this or that, that's fine. You've pointed it out. He's also pointed out that people can use the scroll bar and read for themselves and decide if they wish.
I find alot of this stuff very complicated and some of it is over my head to be honest. I found too that my posts were never enough either. I've already pointed this out to Pwcca, you can read it.
Posts too easily drift into background and the accusations are renewed and you feel totally undermined when you know how much time it can take sometimes to put up a post with content, even if it's not "content" you agree with. I find it takes alot out of me sometimes.
I simply decided to leave the information there, the pictures, the videos and the readers can pretty much decide for themselves. Perhaps oneday I'll re-engage, if I get more time, more inclination and feel up to it.
But does my absence or anybody else's absence need to be exploited and used in such an insulting manner by Linda? particularly when she herself said that debates can be a strain on adrenals (especially for the unwell).....I'm unsure what her point is when many on these forums are indeed battling illness and most seem to disengage from debating/arguments eventually for good reason. I enjoy reading more now than debating. But I hate being accused of something, even when I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING.
