Really?! If CTD is doing so well, then his refutation of the points made by RAZD (just to name one evolutionist) should be easy for you recognize and point out. You made the judgment call that he is doing well.
Can you show us just one refutation of ONE point made by RAZD in the Grand Canyon thread where CTD acquits himself well? Can you explain how that refutation actually addresses the point made by RAZD and shows that point to be incorrect?
If you cannot explain how the "evidence" provided by CTD refutes the evidence/conclusions provided by us, then I fail to see how you are in any position to evaluate the quality of his "battling" skills.

I will concede one area to him however. While I am not innocent of typing insulting remarks, CTD leaves me completely in the dust with his versatility and consistency in that regard.

Perhaps this is the skill to which you refer when making pronouncements about CTD's ability to keep us "evolutionists" at bay.