Originally Posted by CTD in response to statements that the Flood formed the Grand Canyon
But for the honest folk, do you care to have another try at naming a creation scientist who believes in your straw man? Your track record's pretty dismal; shouldn't be too hard for you to improve on it.

I name Hovind. He states (as I have said before) that the 2 lakes shown in the video were formed as a result of the Flood.
No Flood = no lakes (according to Hovind) = no Grand Canyon (also according to Hovind).
Frankly, it is not a great logical leap to say that Hovind supports the conjecture that the Grand Canyon was a result of the Flood.

I'd like to see you respond to RAZD's statement concerning the location of the Grand Canyon being through a point higher than other places on the Kaibab uplift that were also part of the shoreline for those lakes.
Regarding the quality of your responses, let me quote an esteemed alumnus from this board..."Your track record's pretty dismal; shouldn't be too hard for you to improve on it."

Originally Posted by The forgetful CTD
You forget that things need to be verified and reconciled. One can do neither with evodates, so they're of no practical use when investigating history.
You failed to support this opinion of yours in the "A Well Aged Earth" thread. In fact, it looks like you didn't even try to support it. What makes you think you can just blurt it out here as if it were true?

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke