Just how long are you going to evade the questions that have been asked of you?

The quote I gave from Baumgardner shows that he thinks the flood both deposited a large amount of sediment, and carved the Grand Canyon. In a week. Would you like to explain how you read it differently?

Would you also like to explain how cosmogenic and uranium dating methods used in the Grand Canyon are erroneous?

Anyone can simply wave their hand at something and say, "I don't believe it," or "that's wrong." Anyone can say whatever they like, regardless of factual accuracy. Should we start keeping a tally of how many of your posts here a) do not address the questions we've asked you, and b) do not offer a single bit of evidence for your own position (whatever that may be, as you have not even stated it)?