Originally Posted by LinearAq
Originally Posted by CTD
I don't think anyone has attention span issues severe enough to confuse flood waters with waters released subsequently due to bursting dams, but you're welcome to prove me wrong.
No one said that you were saying the Flood directly caused the Grand Canyon.
What have we here? Another individual not scrolling.
Originally Posted by RAZD
In other words the flows in Grand Canyon, while large, are not large enough to be due to biblical flood flows. They are however, large enough to erode the land faster than it has, has been and is rising. Sufficient to account for the canyon being cut through a - now - high point, one of those issues that the biblical flood cut concept fails to explain.

Try again?

Enjoy.

Originally Posted by RAZD
And we still have no evidence that the biblical flood carved the Grand Canyon, just a lot of little distractions, the usual misrepresentations, and insults and moving goalposts.

And LindaLou must hope nobody bothers with verification, when she tries to justify this folly.
Originally Posted by LindaLou
Baumgardner is one creationist who believes that a worldwide flood carved the Grand Canyon and I've shown you why he is wrong about mountains.
Actual Google Results reveal the truth.
http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_platetectonicsl/ ,
http://library.thinkquest.org/29178/noahand.htm ,
and http://www.globalflood.org/papers/geophysicsofgod.html
quickly demonstrate Baumgardner supports the proper creation science theory - not the fantasy version of RAZD & herself.

http://www.nwcreation.net/geologylinks.html has a good supply of links to reality-based articles. It came up in the search, but doesn't directly discuss the canyon.

My guess is that she may intend to create confusion by referencing something like
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/ISD/baumgardner.asp , which
talks about the sedimentary layers of the Grand Canyon, a result of the flood. In the past she claimed evodates for a hole in a glacier could be obtained by dating the ice, so it would be consistent with her previous reasoning.

Of course if I dig a hole in my yard we all understand the age of the hole is not the same as the age of my yard. It'd be kind of hard to dig a hole before the yard existed, but anytime thereafter it's no problem. Evohype is full of such gross insults to the intellect of the target audience.

Must be a real downer, LinearAQ, to witness even more manifestations of stupification. Had you followed my advice and PM'd RAZD to take a break... just maybe you could have avoided some of this suffering. You may want to take a break yourself, for their failure to defeat even this weak straw man could be even more distressing. Better not watch.
Quote
Quote
I am just a little curious where you're going to weigh it on the competing evostories. The perpetually rising spot may need to pick up the pace if it's going to meet the new schedule.
The Kaibab uplift is still rising...can you show me evidence that it is not?
Undecided, eh? But still dedicated to anything-but-the-truth-ism.


Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson