Baumgardner is one creationist who believes that a worldwide flood carved the Grand Canyon
I expect that'd be news to him as much as it'd be news to me, if there were any reason to believe you.
and I've shown you why he is wrong about mountains.
I forget, and I'm at least temporarily too lazy to scroll (unlike those for whom this is a permanent condition). Was it evodates, or that the mainstream disagrees?
I can explain to you why his runaway subduction idea is impossible as well.
I'm sure talkdeceptions or one of your Glens can supply some more inaccuracies, so what?
Are you going to address a single point that RAZD and I have made here or are you going to go the way of other recent creationist posters here and simply ignore it all? In which case, future arguments from you will not have a leg to stand on.
I thought I'd let you all slay your straw men, if you're up to it. For a while it was amusing, but by now everyone's seen that you can't even bear to discuss the real creation science theory of how the Grand Canyon was formed.
What could demonstrate more clearly your fear of the truth?
And looking at your short post which refuses to engage with any evidence presented here, this ironically speaks for itself.
Talk about refusing to engage! Still demanding that I defend
your straw man? Why should I?
How old is this topic, huh? How many posts are in this thread? If I
do decide to scroll up, it'll be to count them. But I expect it'll continue. You people are a brazen bunch. You really don't care how obvious you make it. You have zero to say about actual creation science - and thousands of words to expend building & getting whupped by your own straw men.
It's also noteworthy how readily you abandon your own myths. Wasn't the old myth super-scientific & certain? If I was as confident in my tires as you are in your myths, I wouldn't drive over 20 M.P.H.
