CTD, to repeat, you said that RAZD knows nothing about "creationist models". I asked you to present one. What were you referring to exactly? Your continual failure to do so is telling.
Referring to rivers that periodically flood, such as the Nile and the Mississippi, is evidence for a global flood, or that said flood carved the Grand Canyon . . . how exactly?
As for your link about the "bird tracks," I've had a look around and the only references to these that I can find are a couple of creationist sites, and the only proof that they are bird tracks is creationists saying "they look like bird tracks." What's more, I'm surprised that creationists actually refer to this, because what are fossilised animal prints of any kind doing in so-called flood sediments? This formation also contains ripple marks. Can you explain how footprints and ripple marks can get fossilised in the middle of sediment that was supposed to have been created by a catastrophic flood?
