Still no substance here. I seem to be beginning every post to you in this way.

You said in a post to RAZD that he knew nothing about "creationist models." I asked you to present one. You continue not to do so. I said that if it were legitimate science, it would withstand scrutiny, but you obviously don't think it will stand up to that so you've obfuscated as usual. All you've done so far in this thread is say "I don't believe it" without giving any evidence as to why, and you have not presented an alternative model.

You've been asked to look at the links provided here to information about the scablands and see how they are different from the formations in the Grand Canyon. This is called geography. The links are quite accessible, with lots of photos. The scablands aren't some freak of nature, they are characteristic of what scientists have found when they have studied areas carved by floods. (Last time I looked, the Nile area had not been carved by a catastrophic flood, so your comment there seems rather bizarre. Though interestingly, there is an ancient "grand canyon" underneath the Nile, which was carved by a river at a time when the Mediterranean had evaporated and was a dry area far below sea level.) There are formations in the Grand Canyon that would have been washed away by a flood. You ignore every inconvenient point such as this. I've already asked someone else here today this question: are you interested in facing reality, or only when it suits?

That would include explaining why there are multiple layers of brachiopods ("clams") in the Grand Canyon which show all the signs of having grown there for their 20-year lifespans. According to creationist flood models, they had to have been washed there, but that is not consistent with the evidence.

Regarding LinearAQ telling you that the Himalayas are still being uplifted, check any geological website. He's not making it up. You also should try Googling plate tectonics.

I enjoy talking here with people who bring up interesting points for discussion and who attempt to back up their views in some way. It's getting to be tedious to address post after post which does nothing but blather. What are you actually doing here, if you don't want to engage with what people are saying?