You have not answered my question about what your "creation science" model is. I said that if it wasn't legitimate, you would dodge the question. So far that looks to be the case.

You have not explained why the Grand Canyon is different from the scablands in Washington state, which were carved by a flood. There is no evidence that you have even bothered to find out what these are or what features they exhibit which we expect to see in a flood-carved area.

I told you that brachiopods are found in layers in the Grand Canyon, as well as on the top of Mt. Everest. Again, we have layer after layer of 20-year-old clams which grew anchored to the river bottom. I also provided a link which explains how we know that they weren't just washed there, but grew in place.

Are you actually, EVER, going to address any of the evidence?

My hypothesis is: you can't. Because creation "science" is no such thing, and in order to believe in it you have to ignore reality. We're asking you not to ignore it, we're asking you to address it, and it simply isn't possible for you is it? All you are able to do here is insult people and claim that scientists are liars.