Originally Posted by RAZD
More CTD misrepresentation? Or is it failure to understand.

Quote
Earlier you argued that there could not be more than one worthwhile hypothesis about historic events.
No, CTD, I said that two contradictory hypothesis could not both be true.
Sure... just because you can't use a scroll bar, nobody else can either.

Bet you're wishing you could edit about now.
Quote
You have not show any difficulties whatsoever in reconciling a clam with the history you choose to reject, 20 years old or 100. If this is one of the many, many clams fossilized with a closed shell, it is powerful evidence indeed that the flood took place as recorded.

Quote
But you have it exactly backwards: you are the one that needs to explain how layer after layer after layer with 20 year old clams get onto mountaintops when -- as you agreed -- there is no way they could grow there during the (too brief) flood.
Huh? If you plan to attack a straw man, please define it first, 'K?

Quote
Quote
All contemporary flood models feature plate tectonics.
Which just shows how strongly plate tectonics is validated as a process to cause uplift of marine sediment into mountains. The problem that creationists run into is that when you scale the timeframe down to YEC mythological time, you would end up with lava instead of mountain due to the heat of friction.
...from one who just a post ago didn't think creationists knew what plate tectonics were. My, don't you learn fast!

Quote
All current creationist models also include variation and adaptation - "microevolution" - because it is so well validated that it is difficult to ignore.
As if you actually have a clue about any real creation science models... What a shameful farce!

Quote
Quote
Because rather than repost, it makes more sense for you to scroll up to the earlier parts of the thread. I shan't copy & paste that much just to waste my time.
In other words there is no evidence.

Enjoy.
Your unique misinterpretations at work again, I see.

Boring...

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson