You are just so funny CTD.
I see RAZD's comical attempt to discuss other flood stories in this thread rather than the one devoted to proper historical procedures.
And you were the one that introduced the subject of other flood myths as though they automatically validated the one you preferred of all the ones you can find that mention water. Now you say there is only one: I guess when confronted with the evidence you change your story instead of admit your mistake eh?
All I have done is show that there are other flood stories, but none of them conform to the biblical story, so they cannot be support for it (unless you employ that other creationist standby, the logical fallacy of special pleading). What other flood stories are evidence for are other floods, and other survivals (unless you go with the psychological theory that creation myths of land being separated from water are like birth). This is not surprising when you look at the numbers of human habitations on flood plains and the link between agriculture and water.
The canyon is evidence, ...
... of erosion, with wind erosion playing as much a part as erosion from rain. Water erosion
per se is not evidence of flooding, just of water flowing, unless you call every little rainstorm a flood.
The clincher for the Grand Canyon though is that it has been formed by erosion as the rock it is carved through has been pushed up to the point where the rims are higher than the surrounding land: how do you carve through a high point CTD? Or do you think water flows uphill?
... and the presence of the great ghost lake makes the case pretty solid.
So a lake in Taiwan is evidence that the Grand Canyon was caused by a flood? Please. Next you'll be claiming that
Crater Lake was formed by the flood.
... but I'm told if you ask a canyon tour guide how the "box canyons" (the little side canyons which join the Grand Canyon at angles) came to be, you just get an angry stare for an answer.
Are those guides the ones that tell you it is formed by the flood? Or is this just another completely unfounded CTD myth? Either way, box canyons to the side of the main channel are
not formed by any single flood outflow, nor do flood outflows form meandering stream courses.
Well, I see that nobody's addressed the issue of water flowing uphill for millions of years.
What's humorous about this is that you still fail to answer the question of how 20 year old clam-like shells are on Mt Everest, and other mountains, brachiopods that grow on a stalk once they've passed their free swimming larval stage.
If you read my answer to how they got there again, you will note that it does not require water to flow up hill, as it is the ground that is lifted out of the water by normal
known tectonic mechanisms.
Looks like you still can't answer the question of how the fossils of 20 year old shells are found on mountain tops. Science can.
All in all what do we have from your post CTD? A lack of evidence for the flood, still, and a lack of explanation for the evidence that says something else was responsible.
Enjoy.
