Hey LindaLou,
I'm not going to thoroughly read all the griping here.
It's all just another excuse to avoid dealing with the issues. Remember how cognitive dissonance works - the path of least resistance.
Why am I here Bex?
Two reasons: (1) I find it mildly amusing the lengths creationists will go to avoid actually answering question and dealing with issues, and maybe see if they will actually consider the facts - like how a 20 year old clam shell can be evidence for a flood that only lasted a couple hundred days, tops. I also learn things in the process of putting together my arguments, by researching the answers. Like the fact that brachiopods (a kind of clam-like organism with fossils on Mt Everest) grow stalks and are thereby tethered to the bottom.
But more importantly, (2) to provide a rational alternative for those who do want to consider reality, an alternative from the falsehoods and hoopla of the creationists propaganda - like thinking that tanned skin can be hereditary when there is no path to the DNA of reproduction cells, like thinking that DNA can be "programmed" for future changes (which means that the 3/4's of zygotes that don't make it to being a healthy human baby are just programming errors?).
Funny that creationists, in their rabid desire to falsify evolution repeat concepts that science has already considered, tested, invalidated, and discarded as false, and just a little bit of study would show this to be the case.
Why are you here? To learn?
Enjoy.
