Another failure to face truth, SoSick.
the bible is much more factual than the myth of evolution you just ...
... have to wonder why creationists have so much trouble finding any they can use in an argument.
How do those other myths support a biblical flood? They don't match the Noah storyline, so what do they show?
How do 20 year old clam shells on mountaintops support a biblical flood? They don't match the Noah storyline either, so what do they show?
I know you don't like to admit it but believers out number non-believers 2 to 1.
Which -- true or false -- is irrelevant to whether they understand reality. This is the logical fallacy of popularity of an opinion.
no surprise the loss of your purty stars.
If your
previous post is indicative of the kind of intellectual level needed to get 5 stars, I don't want any.
If the failure of CTD, SoSick, and Russ, among others, to deal with the evidence that is presented in an argument is what is needed to get 5 stars, I don't want any.
If the failure of CTD, SoSick, Russ, and others, to provide any evidence to support their assertions, it the level of argument that is rewarded with 5 stars, then I don't want any.
If earning stars is dependent on the opinions of people that don't want to understand reality, then I don't want any.
If earning stars is dependent on the opinions of people that don't have the courage to engage in the debate themselves, and test their arguments against facts, then I don't want any.
I don't believe in / worship false idols.
Enjoy.
ps - I gave you 5 stars for your previous post. It demonstrates the full breadth and depth of the creationist argument in a way that nothing I post could match.
