|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
As far as debunking the foraminifera argument, I don't see that there's been any argument to debunk. It was just alleged that they prove evolutionism, but when I looked at them they didn't prove it, so I consider the hypothesis falsified. So you think someone can falsify a hypothesis because they decide they just . . . don't believe it, even though they don't give a single reason for why. The hypothesis was tested and failed. I tested the hyptothesis by following the link and looking at what was there. According to the hypothesis, this should have proven evolutionism to me. It didn't. What do we do with falsified hypotheses? Some of us throw them out, and some of us print them in textbooks as 'evidence of evolutionsim', that's what we do. If this is the way creation "science" works then you have no reason to complain about why it is not taken seriously. Swing & a miss! So now you are claiming that certain bacteria and slime molds could not have evolved because we have learned more about them and have had to change some of our previous ideas? It is a common pattern that the more one learns about things, the more difficult it is for one to believe falsehood. Of course it depends on learning something relevant - not just any learning will do. How about posting some concrete information here, along with some inferences you've drawn from it, rather than the same tired snide remarks and logical fallacies. How about posting some concrete information here, along with some inferences you've drawn from it, rather than the same tired snide remarks and logical fallacies? And if you mean to imply that I employ logical fallacies, I defy you to produce two or more examples of a real logical fallacy (not just something you don't want me to say) which I have posted. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bunnydance.gif" alt="" />
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
