Ooooh, naked legs!! You promise?

I'm trying to think of debates with creationists that I've read which fulfill your criteria. Sometimes you come across a website by a creationist with a scientific degree, or an exchange some such person has had with evolutionist scientists. That's probably as good as it gets. I'm fascinated and repelled in equal measure by the way these kinds of creationists use what they do know about science to misrepresent it to others whom they know will accept it unquestioningly.

However, if the foundation for your argument is lacking stability (i.e. a solid factual basis), I suppose you have no option but to resort to the sorts of tactics we keep seeing: emotional arguments, logical fallacies, insults, avoidance of evidence, arguments from ignorance, straw men, etc etc.

You never know though, we can hope, and we may see your naked legs yet!