Hi Jeanie, welcome aboard!

This is a bit of a non-sequitur but a few points in your post made me wish to raise the following.

Citing that you (you in general) have "felt" the Christian god or that he has somehow "spoken" to you is not verification of his existence. I could just as well label this as delusional behavior and that would be no more or less of a provable statement (and no, I'm not saying you're delusional, just that that remark has the same amount of clout).

What's more, what happens when I interject and say that I have felt my gods, that they have spoken to me (and I them)? You speak of your god and of people ignoring him, what about other people's gods? By the sound of it, I'd say you're ignoring my gods -- but I'm not pointing fingers in that regard. I am sincerely asking as politely as possible and so I ask that you not take my query offensively but what's the difference? What's the difference between saying people are ignoring your singular god and for me to say that people are ignoring my plural gods? Or for that matter if an ancient Norseman appeared today and said we're ignoring Odin?

Incidentally, I don't think you need to take RAZD's posts as offensive or insulting. They looked quite straight forward and direct to me -- admittedly sometimes posts of this sort can come across as cold and clinical, and thus feel offensive or insulting. That doesn't mean they are. Personally, I take them to be observations and questions. Nothing more.