All of this is old ground which we have discussed before, CTD.
Comparing life to a child building something out of blocks is a
non sequitur. The underlying assumption is that life was designed. The idea that it could have evolved, step by step, over billions of years, is rejected outright. Yet this is what we see from the fossil record, genetics, and dating methods. Claiming that our information is "cherry-picked" without providing any rationale for why you think this is, shows that you don't appear to have paid much attention to RAZD's lessons in reasoned debating.
I think I explained the human & ape fossil mix quite plainly. The feet diagrams cannot be present if one desires confusion.
I asked you to read
this detailed article about hominid fossil feet last time this subject was discussed. In particular, I drew your attention to the discussion of transitional characteristics of fossil feet of
australopithecines and
homo habilis. I also gave you a link which showed you diagrams of
australopithecine pevlis, femur and foot bones showing transitional characteristics between an ape and a human. Ignoring the evidence doesn't make it go away.
As far as debunking the foraminifera argument, I don't see that there's been any argument to debunk. It was just alleged that they prove evolutionism, but when I looked at them they didn't prove it, so I consider the hypothesis falsified.
So you think someone can falsify a hypothesis because they decide they just . . . don't believe it, even though they don't give a single reason for why. If this is the way creation "science" works then you have no reason to complain about why it is not taken seriously.
So now you are claiming that certain bacteria and slime molds could not have evolved because we have learned more about them and have had to change some of our previous ideas? If scientists were not willing to do this, we would still think the earth is flat and at the middle of the solar system.
How about posting some concrete information here, along with some inferences you've drawn from it, rather than the same tired snide remarks and logical fallacies.
