My anticipation is based on being familiar with the types of claims that creationists here continually make. Your links seem to be talking about how new things have been learned about certain organisms and how they appear to be more complex than was thought. Instead of being pleasantly interested in the fact that we're learning more abot life on earth, a creationist will say, "Look! Even the simplest-seeming life on earth could not have evolved." This statement ignores quite a lot of evidence to the contrary, however, including the fossil record, dating methods and genetics.


And the person who came here to start this new thread about a new topic is . . .?

As I recall, you refused to comment on the human fossil record and didn't have anything to say about the foraminifera fossil record either. I'm not asking you to "debunk" these, but to explain how you can claim that evolution doesn't occur when evidence like this exists. You either have to explain it, or ignore it, and you have chosen to do the latter.


Not much of a chip on your shoulder then.


Oh yes, since you've started the topic here, I'm fine with that. Maybe you'd like to explain the point you want to make.