I would anticipate a re-tread of the "it's too complex to have evolved" argument, though even that seems to be reaching a bit here.
Perhaps your anticipation is based upon what your own eyes tell you? Better adjust your goggles, if you're starting to see things. If they still don't work, be careful about where you go shopping for a new pair.
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/fittingglasses.gif" alt="" />
I'm pretty mystified myself. I'm also a little tired of how, when creationists here are unable to address evidence such as the foraminifera or human fossil records, they simply start new topics. I can't say that slime molds set my world on fire.
If the situation were as you say, and creationists were avoiding discussions, you should consider it a plus, because it would be evident for all to see that creationists can't cope.
But we know otherwise. The threads don't convey that message. What they show is evolutionists continually changing the subject, unwilling to discuss most topics, preferring rather to spam bunk & then say we have to debunk all of it; then stubbornly refusing to acknowledge even that which has been thoroughly debunked.
Although I agree with Russ, I think your best hope is in selecting victims with amazingly short attention spans & severely limited short-term memory in addition to credulity & emotional prejudices. You need people who will forget what's been debunked; and who will believe that which has been clearly demonstrated yesterday doesn't count when you say today that it has not been shown. People disinclined to use a scroll bar & see what was said a few posts back.
Now if you'd prefer not to discuss slime molds or bacteria, don't. I think they're interesting, and I don't think it would be good to introduce them in another thread where they don't fit. Just because I study evolutionists does not mean I intend to pick up their habits.
