What I've "picked up on" from your conversation here with RAZD is that you know little about what you're criticising, which is a comment I've made to you and others here before. You refuse to engage with the information which has been presented and are re-iterating comments you made previously which have clearly been proved to be erroneous (i.e. what is meant in PE terms by "large" mutations). Your most recent post about this is nothing but more raving because you seem to want to have the last word.

Will a creationist who has studied some real evidence for any of the topics under discussion here, please step forward.