Quote
Beat me to it RAZD . . . it looks to me like we're not going to have any answers to your question here. (BTW, I can't get your link to work-?)

CTD, the best you can do here is to say "I see no feet"? And Bex, assuming that the rest of these skeletons don't exist? (We're just looking at morphological differences between the skulls in this instance.) Can neither of you at least have a go at engaging with the actual evidence here?

Your own creationist leaders have tried to answer this question. According to their beliefs, it should be easy to tell the difference between apes and humans because the two were never similar. Yet curiously they don't agree here.

You'll notice that the above link discusses other skeletal parts of some of these fossils (e.g. Turkana Boy, homo erectus). You'll also notice links from that page which will explain what, despite Bex's objections to the contrary, archaeologists and paleontologists are able to study and learn from these fossils.
"According to their beliefs", eh? Which creationist has claimed each & every tiny fragment of a skeleton can be clearly distinguished?

It is evolutionists who produce skulls as evidence. Incomplete skulls at that, usually broken in more than one place. It is they who combine them with monkey bones in crazy composites. But they don't even agree among themselves, do they? Hmmm, do they?

Show me a complete creature, and if it's ape or man, anyone will be able to tell the difference. Failing that, produce a complete skeleton & people will still see the difference.

But what the evolutionists themselves have long known, is that anything with hands on its feet is a monkey; anything with feet on its feet is a man. Do you claim anyone has trouble understanding that the specimen was a monkey? C'mon - you're an evolutionist & we all enjoy a laugh. What's stopping you?

You asked how to draw the line clearly & unmistakably. I answered. "Riddle" solved. Your evospin can't alter this.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson