Beat me to it RAZD . . . it looks to me like we're not going to have any answers to your question here. (BTW, I can't get your link to work-?)

CTD, the best you can do here is to say "I see no feet"? And Bex, assuming that the rest of these skeletons don't exist? (We're just looking at morphological differences between the skulls in this instance.) Can neither of you at least have a go at engaging with the actual evidence here?

Your own creationist leaders have tried to answer this question. According to their beliefs, it should be easy to tell the difference between apes and humans because the two were never similar. Yet curiously they don't agree here.

You'll notice that the above link discusses other skeletal parts of some of these fossils (e.g. Turkana Boy, homo erectus). You'll also notice links from that page which will explain what, despite Bex's objections to the contrary, archaeologists and paleontologists are able to study and learn from these fossils.