|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
Hello Pwcca, Since some of the creationist posters here have alleged that the various hominid species do not exist or are merely old ape bones or old modern human bones, it would help for us to see how this conclusion is drawn and based on what evidence. I'm certain the scientists of the world would be eager to see you show them the error of their ways, especially since -- as anyone making such an audacious claim would have to be -- you've established this belief with extensive research and study of no less effort than what the scientists have put in themselves (i.e., years and years worth of meticulous digging, sorting and analyzing). It's also quite amusing to look at the various quite contradictory divisions of hominids in to these two different categories by the various creationist "experts" ... But let me help you out: start with this picture and we can then have everybody pick the apes and the humans out for us (from http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html):<img src="http://herballure.com/ForumExtras/Images/rssfqkipao.jpg">Enjoy Where between {A} (chimp) and {N} (Homo sapiens) do you draw the line? Enjoy
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
