|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 449
Advanced Master Member
|
Hello Pwcca, Since some of the creationist posters here have alleged that the various hominid species do not exist or are merely old ape bones or old modern human bones, it would help for us to see how this conclusion is drawn and based on what evidence. I'm certain the scientists of the world would be eager to see you show them the error of their ways, especially since -- as anyone making such an audacious claim would have to be -- you've established this belief with extensive research and study of no less effort than what the scientists have put in themselves (i.e., years and years worth of meticulous digging, sorting and analyzing). It's also quite amusing to look at the various quite contradictory divisions of hominids in to these two different categories by the various creationist "experts" ... But let me help you out: start with this picture and we can then have everybody pick the apes and the humans out for us (from http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html):<img src="http://herballure.com/ForumExtras/Images/rssfqkipao.jpg">Enjoy Where between {A} (chimp) and {N} (Homo sapiens) do you draw the line? Enjoy
|
|
|
|
|