|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
There is a very simple, and foolproof method for defining the contents of evolutionism: let the evolutionists define it. I do not jest. Do not ask them and expect a meaningful answer; such would be folly. Let their actions define the term. When they expel a scientist, find out what he questioned. When they insist that children be indoctrinated, they'll give you their beliefs. In this manner, a comprehensive definition can be obtained, and it will be far more accurate than anything published in dictionaries or textbooks. Now, let's see the heathens <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/reallymad.gif" alt="" />
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
