Quote
Quote
Rabbits don't chew cud...the Bible is wrong about that.
This is a noteworthy example, for it show us that God defines a thing based on what it is. His opposition defines a thing based on where it is.

The cow chews partially digested food, and so does the rabbit. The only difference is the route taken by the undigested food. In the cow, the food comes back up the way it went down. In the rabbit, the food exits the rabbit & enters the mouth.

God's method is scientifically sound, and the other method is worthless. Well, not entirely. I see it applied to fool the gullible into thinking babies aren't babies...
Nice dodge concerning a difficult passage...and an added insult to evolutionists. I am an anti-abortionist BTW.

Sorry, I can't continue along this vein with you, since you don't want to be drawn off-topic. I think you should continue to present 7-day creation evidence. Oh...I mean you should try to present at least one piece of evidence.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke