What about a Neanderthal? Have they always been a Neanderthal? Oh wait, sorry -- I forgot. Cavemen never really existed. It's all one big conspiracy by the scientists to .. uhm .. do something. And stuff.
Neanderthal is just a label given by evolutionists. I'm surprised by your ignorance here, who on earth has disputed cavemen? In fact, anybody can be a caveman and it takes only one generation to pretty much become pretty uncivilised (at least by our standards). You just have to show your offspring only one way of life and they'll do the same thing, unless they know or see otherwise. There is actually nothing monkey about the "neanderthals" (though a few were suffering badly from vitamin/mineral deficiencies and old age). Now, one can start pointing fingers at other races and deciding they are not quite evolved yet based on their lifestyle, but any intelligent person would know this is racist and also completely silly! You only have to check out some tribes around the world to see how they live in certain areas to know that many have not really changed from their ancestral lifestyles. Interpreting fossils to fit in with your belief system is dishonest. We have seen this with the ape to man theories and the hoaxes involved. The animal/fish/plant fossils I posted have shown NO signs of ever being any different than they are today. If anything, some have shown to be bigger and better, but no real change otherwise. Most of that is simply based on the environment. Given the right environment (tropics for example), Plants and insects are prime examples of increased growth.
Like LinearAq, I too am patiently waiting on evidence for 7-day creation. I'll be happy to give the evidence a read just as soon as you're willing to provide us with it. It would actually be quite neat to read, and I'm not being sarcastic in any way.
Please scroll up. I think your request here has already been answered and turned down by CTD, it seems you're not really reading the posts properly or choosing not to. Either way, this trend winds up becoming a waste of time to others on here. I'll remind you for the umpteenth time, as tiring as this is, that no creationist on this forum has made great claims of scientific evidence for 7 day creation (unless I'm mistaken and have missed a post?). One can provide their view as to why they believe it or any area at their leisure if they choose to put something together. Isn't that was this is about? An invitation.....or is this a command?
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/chiefwiggum.jpg" alt="" />
At any rate, I am not out to "convince" the "unconvincable", but I'll post a link to this free video download (which is quick, even on dial-up), to anybody that is
interested and I emphasize the word
interested in hearing this view for a young earth and 7 day creation. Please, if you haven't watched this video, don't claim you were not given anything in favour of this belief. Whether or not you think it's evidence is another story.
http://nwcreation.net/videos/evidence_for_youngearth.html