Quote
I was wondering exactly which branch of scientific study actually looks for God so as to compel your scientific minds to a serious discussion of God as the creator.
Science doesn't look for the supernatural but it does look for what the supernatural is said to have done. If there is evidence to support the Universe coming into existence less than 10,000 years ago then that would lend support to God having done it the way Genesis says. Therefore, scientists who are supporters of the Genesis record should be asking questions like:
"What should be present in the geologic strata if the world were poofed into existence only 10,000 years ago?"
Then they should go out and look for the things that they predicted would be there.

Quote
I do think it's interesting that man is still doing exactly as God first told man (Adam) to do in regard to the life of this earth... that is to name it. He doesn't seem to have moved very far beyond that yet in this regard, observing, naming... but if you know something I don't like he has found the secret of life, has begun creating life and taking his own notes in that regard, you should let us all know because then you might actually begin to settle the matter.
That stuff can't be presented here since this thread is about creationism evidence.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke