|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 644
Elite Member
|
The link above does not show the correct page for the biblical creation scientists. Here they are:
Some modern scientists who have accepted the biblical account of creation Wow! Some list. Here's an alternate list that provides the names of scientists named Steve who agree with the following statement. Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools.The name "Steve" and derivatives of that name constitute about 1% of the population of the US. Therefore, it is a reliable statistical relationship to conclude is that about 100 times the number of signatories on the Steve list is representative of the number of scientists in the US that agree with the above statement. Your appeal to authority is not working out. Didn't you say earlier that an appeal to authority was a fallacy by evolutionists? Goose, gander. Dentists, Plastic Surgeons, and Engineers are Scientists? Wow! I'm a scientist...I'll have to update my resume`.
A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|