Quote
You are still stuck with the objective evidence being either true to that one objective reality or it is false, and so far you seem to be on the side thinking the evidence is false.
I transplanted this, as it may tie in.

There's no "stuck" involved with having one reality. This is what I've maintained. Evidence either exists or does not. Even faked evidence is evidence that someone was motivated to deceive. "Evidence is false" is a nonsensical statement. As you have confused terms before, I predict you shall continue to do so with the term 'evidence'. You'll be hard-pressed to produce any evidence that a creationist has denied the existence of the White Cliffs of Dover, so you'll maintain that your interpretation constitutes evidence. Nothing new. Interpretations aren't evidence.

If interpretations were evidence, I suppose I should claim some more for Skunk Funk. Skunk Funk already claims the cliffs, as they're geologic and made up of fossils, but I can interpret them and claim additional evidence perhaps?

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson