Looks like selective memory is operating again. That pesky discussion of varves, ice cores and tree rings must be far enough in the past now for you to conveniently forget about it -- or, more predictably, to brush it off with, "I don't believe it." Why not employ some of your guidelines of hsitorical study by going back to that thread and reminding yourself of why it's difficult to reconcile "evidence for a global flood" with millions of layers of biannual varves in the same area.

The story of the flood may be verified in your own head but you will notice that most people do not share this fantasy with you. Can you produce an article from a respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal that gives solid evidence that a global flood has been verified, or does that not count in your book because scientists are liars?

BTW your AiG links do not answer the questions that RAZD has put directly to you, about delicate organisms and prints of raindrops within very old sedimentary layers. All you are offering is "Woodmorappe says so," and we've shown you in various places before on this forum where Woodmorappe is wrong. Have a Google about chalk formation and you will see for yourself. These sorts of creationist articles rely on the geological ignorance of the people who read them.