Quote
Bex just provided videos and accounts of evidence for floods, and evidence of marine life on mountains, which may support a massive flood but doesn't clear up which story is the true one. I gave an explanation for why the marine life could be on the mountaintop and you came up with that monstrosity of an assertion which claimed that continental drift was first thought up by a creationist weatherman with no training in geology. When called on it, you crawled into your "stay on topic" mode. How convenient.


I "just" provided videos.....and evidence for floods. I provided evidence for a worldwide catastrophe/flood Linear, not lots of local floods, please re-read the information given. You specifically requested something other than written/oral history and it was given to you as CTD has also pointed out. What more do you want? A visitation from the ghost of Noah? Not only have I given fossil pictures and a link to the fossil museum site, but posted videos (which I doubt you have even viewed) containing lots of evidence that points to a worldwide flood (far more than I could ever hope to pass on), but I have also shared the incredible "coincidences" (I believe evidence) for the existence of the 8 people and the ark in the very area that the bible states they all landed and the incredible evidence surrounding that place, which seems to indicate the biblical account was the true account (no surprise there).

I wonder what more a person is supposed to provide for you? You want evidence, but when it's given, you spit it back out or overlook half of what's been posted. This makes it very tiring to those that have made the effort because you requested it.

I'm honestly not sure how anybody can possibly cater further to your wants/needs <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/babypacifier.gif" alt="" />. What is it about the bible that you have such an aversion to that you'd almost jump to anything else, so long as it's not corresponding with the biblical account? Is the idea that the accounts within this holy book being a reality distasteful to you because of the moral implications if it turns out the bible is an accurate historical account?