The thread is about history, specifically the flood history and the idea that a world-wide flood destroying most of mankind is a common story in most cultures. I asked how we know the Bible story is the true account seeing as all the others are different from it...some are so significantly different as to be almost unrecognizable.

From that point the only one to try and answer was SoSick. Her answer was basically that she assumes the Bible is right, which is really inadequate to a non-believer, but it at least provided her point of view.

Bex just provided videos and accounts of evidence for floods, and evidence of marine life on mountains, which may support a massive flood but doesn't clear up which story is the true one. I gave an explanation for why the marine life could be on the mountaintop and you came up with that monstrosity of an assertion which claimed that continental drift was first thought up by a creationist weatherman with no training in geology. When called on it, you crawled into your "stay on topic" mode. How convenient.

Since you want to stay on topic, then provide some evidence that your flood story is more likely to be true than, for example, the Iroquois flood story.