It is maintained by some that valid, long-established, confirmed history should be abandoned in favour of revisions recently penned by atheist/secular sources.

I maintain the proper conduct of historical research consists of three parts: Discovery, Verification, and Reconciliation.

The established record is much stronger than the replacement(s) to which I've been exposed. Rather than following proper procedures, pseudoscience has been hailed as the ultimate form of knowledge and presented as having more authority than history. It is utterly impossible for this to be true, since history is chief over all other sciences.

For those who have forgotten, here is a small sample of the rich history evolutionists would have us forget.