|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
I'm posting LinearAq's question again since it has gone unanswered. This is something I'd really like to see responded to. So would one be incorrect to conclude that you're posting this because you also would like to divert attention from the subjectivity of the trees? I haven't yet seen any acknowledgment that the "objective" tree claim is false.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
