SoSick, I'm not sure why you have addressed a question about evolution, genetics and general biology to CTD. I think LinearAQ knows more about these things than anyone else here at the moment. There's also the internet to browse, and Talkorigins to look at for specific questions like these. If you ever wanted to join EvC, then you could ask the scientists themselves.

Evolution and genetics complement each other. One field does not stand alone without the other. Here is a page which should help answer your some of questions: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution Part 4: The Molecular Sequence Evidence

And CTD, you've been asked more than once to back up your assertions with evidence. I see none here.


You've been shown a lot of evidence for evolution here. Repeating inaccuracies like this does not make them come true.


Same as above. Repeated assertions, no evidence, even though you have been shown how the evidence for evolution is not circular. Repetition of a falsehood does not turn it into a truth.

Show me an example of a scientist who is confused and who clearly thinks that genetics=evolution.


We have discussed Haeckel and oncology in another thread. I explained to you, very basically, how hox genes work. Ignoring them won't make them go away. Repeatedly claiming that evolutionists still believe Haeckel's ideas won't turn a falsehood into a truth. SoSick, you might want to look at that thread in answer to some of your questions; it is called "Recap Frauds" (more creative names).


No it isn't, and if you think that all homology means is that things look alike, you need to look up homology.

You think scientists are pretty stupid, don't you? You didn't answer my question about why you won't discuss this topic with them on EvC. Why don't you go there and tell them how stupid their science is?


Evidence?


We also can look to genetics. And it also fits with the larger body of evidence. You might be interested to read my reply to Bex in the "More Biblical Evidence" thread, which covers this.


This is news to me, and I've been reading about nested heirarchies. Please explain why you think this is a lie in terms of evolution.


Please present evidence for these assertions.

I can assert anything I want to as well. The law of gravity is wrong. It's true because I say so. If you have a vested interest in believing this then you will accept it unquestioningly and thank me for saying it. But it doesn't make a lick of sense because there's a pretty huge body of evidence to the contrary that we'd both be ignoring.


Please substantiate these vague assertions.