Quote
I'm not sure I understand the gist of your last post -- do you think that by discussing neo-Darwinism, you have shown evolution to be a lie? The solid basis here is that all of these scientists agree that evolution occurred. The debate has been about how.
You're soooo close! The question is how they agreed!

Unless you're an Hegelian, the very term "modern evolutionary synthesis" is tantamount to confessing that it's untrue. The thesis-antithesis-synthesis process cannot actually work.

On the other hand, if you were an Hegelian, you would have already understood that genetics was the antithesis of Darwinism. What? Are you going to convert just so you can argue?

I'm sleepy. Should be back Monday or Tuesday - weekend's unclear.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson